Monday, September 3, 2012

The Dude Abides


By Desson Howe
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 6, 1998

 
On balance, you could argue that the 1996 "Fargo" still outweighs "The Big Lebowski," the latest comedy from the Coen brothers. There's something about "Fargo" that really lasts. Maybe it's that grotesque shredder that juliennes its victims, or Marge (Frances McDormand), the pregnant detective with morning sickness, who kneels before an overturned car to retch, the snowy landscape of Minnesota behind her.

 Paragraph  1:
Here the author compares the movie being reviewed with the previous work from the directing team. This allows the reader to make a good initial judgment based on their individual experience with the afore mentioned filmed

But there's too much fun in "The Big Lebowski" to quibble about such things. It may not have the staying power of its predecessor, but it has something indisputably its own: bowling! Bowling Coen brothers style, that is. It has the perfect Coen brothers cast too: Jeff Bridges, John Goodman, Steve Buscemi and John Turturro. Picture these guys moping around a California bowling alley, contemplating the lanes before them with hangdog faces, weird verbal inflections and immensely tacky clothing. With this package you can't go wrong.
Paragraph 2:
The author begins the second paragraph my stating that despite its difference from the previous work of the Coen brothers, it is still a fun movie while at the same time outlining the cast , characters and their nuances , and the main plot fulcrum on the movie

Bridges plays Jeff Lebowski, alias "The Dude." Lost permanently in the 1970s, he wanders around Venice, Calif., in a pot-suffused haze. He likes drinking White Russians, and he loves to hurl balls with his regular pals, Walter (Goodman), the loudmouthed owner of a security store, and Donny (Buscemi), a laid-back former surfer. In their screenplay for this movie, Ethan (also the producer) and Joel Coen (who directed) describe the Dude as "a man in whom casualness runs deep." They couldn't have put it better.
Paragraph 3:
The author continues to explain the main characters in further detail

The Dude's life is rudely interrupted when two bruisers rough him up, supposedly to threaten him for his wife's gambling excesses. But the Dude isn't even married. It seems the thugs, who work for a mysterious man called Jackie Treehorn (Ben Gazzara), have mistaken him for another Jeff Lebowski (David Huddleston), an old Pasadena millionaire whose wife racked up all that debt. To add insult to injury, one of them urinates on Dude's favorite rug. This being a Coen Brothers movie, Dude finds himself embroiled in a kidnapping plot, in which Lebowski's people recruit him to deliver ransom money to the kidnappers. But when Dude solicits Walter's advice on the matter, things get even worse. Walter forces Dude to cheat the kidnappers of their lucre.
Paragraph 4:
Paragraph 4 outlines the main conflict of the plot while outlining how the different characters deal with the issues placed before them

Now, everyone's chasing them. Dude just wants two things: his rug cleaned and the chance to bowl against his archrival, Jesus Quintana (John Turturro), a hotdog whose tight, high-waisted bowling uniform shows a little too much of everything. The kidnapping scenario serves as a wonderful framework for characters who can only be described as Coenesque. Bridges has a princely dopiness that sits just right in this movie. But Goodman, whether he's listening to his bowling ball, dominating conversations with his hilarious arrogance or clamping on to one particular opponent's ear Mike Tyson style, is the breakout star of the show. Julianne Moore is amusingly out there, as Maude, the richer Lebowski's eccentric daughter who takes a fancy to the Dude, and who stars in Dude's Busby Berkeley-style fantasy as a Valkyrie bowling goddess. You'll also meet three self-styled nihilists, played by Peter Stormare (Buscemi's nefarious partner in "Fargo"), Torsten Voges and Flea of the Red Hot Chili Peppers, who dress in Monty Pythonesque black and, at one point, corner Dude in a bathtub and threaten his privates with a savage marmot.
Paragraph  5 :
Folowing the path of a Coen Bros. plot the writer introduces more characters and plot conflicts as they arise in the movie, and continues to praise the directing team for their originality and their ability to stick to their own particular recipe of movie making
With their inspired, absurdist taste for weird, peculiar Americana-but a sort of neo-Americana that is entirely invented-the Coens have defined and mastered their own bizarre subgenre. No one does it like them and, it almost goes without saying, no one does it better.

Paragraph 6 :
The author closes the review with continued accolades for the Coen Bros. and their definitively different style of film making in a near gushing manor .  Even though I myself being a fan of the Bros , and the movie in its own right,  the closing statement could dissuade a potential viewer that is not used to the unique style of cinema .

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/movies/videos/biglebowskihowe.htm

2 comments:

Amy Bolaski said...

Calem,

You write, "Here the author compares the movie being reviewed with the previous work from the directing team. This allows the reader to make a good initial judgment based on their individual experience with the afore mentioned filmed." Funny, most of the posts I've read thus far have used or begun with some comparison or another to other directors and films. This seems like an effective comparison in the sense that Fargo fans would like "The Big Lebowski".

The 2nd paragraph also employs visual imagery and a bit of characterization.

Well done: "Paragraph 4 outlines the main conflict of the plot while outlining how the different characters deal with the issues placed before them." These issues are usually called subplots or plot arcs."

Amy Bolaski said...

Also,

This: "With their inspired, absurdist taste for weird, peculiar Americana-but a sort of neo-Americana that is entirely invented-the Coens have defined and mastered their own bizarre subgenre" comes from a review itself; if you're quoting the reviewer in the middle of your own paragraph (that seems to be what's happening here), you need to put it in quotes and put the author's last name in parentheses after it.