I chose this article
because it has to do with the other side of what my topic is about. In my paper I wrote about how parents are too
worried about being their child’s friend.
The two articles go from one extreme to the next. This article is about parents who are “helicoptering”
(hovering) over their children and, though they want the best for them (as any
parent does), they tend to push them in the wrong direction. I do agree with the writer’s claims made
through-out the article. Children that
are pushed too hard WILL push back at some point and the only people that will
be hurt are the parents.
Right
off the bat, the first thing that caught my attention was the title. The writer claims that children need to be
prepared for the hard times life throws at them as they get older and that it
is our job, as parents, to make sure that they are. By making an appeal to ethos he questions why
parents really want their kids to be successful at sports, in certain clubs, or
other things that parents sign their kids up for that the kids really don’t want
to be a part of. Aside from misspelled
words and some grammatical errors, it flowed fairly well.
1 comment:
Estevan,
When you write, " The two articles go from one extreme to the next", do you mean yours and this article take opposite perspectives?
When you write, "By making an appeal to ethos he questions why parents really want their kids to be successful at sports, in certain clubs, or other things that parents sign their kids up for that the kids really don’t want to be a part of" I'm wondering how this is an appeal to ethos (want their kids to be successful). Claim/identification needs explanation (practice for the opinion piece. :)
Post a Comment