1) Article: Targeting "Slutty" Students; by
Jessica Valenti; http://www.thenation.com/blog/168298/targeting-slutty-students
2) Summary: In the article "Targeting 'Slutty'
Students, Valenti brings attention to the issue of dress codes in a high school
setting. The author discusses that the “more curvy” female students are criticized
by faculty members for their clothing.
Valenti also argues that this issue is a direct violation of the students'
rights under Title IX. The author emphasizes that the dress code in schools
sends a powerful message to young women, that they are responsible for the way "society
objectifies and sexualizes them."
3) a) Allusion: The author alludes to the Educational Amendments
of 1972, which forbids all forms of sexual discrimination.
"In fact, it’s their right under Title IX."
b) Pathos (emotions): The author uses a quote from a senior
from a high school to gain sympathy for the women being subjected to
discrimination by faculty members.
" Another senior, Lucinda Ventimiglia, told the student
newspaper, the Spectator,
“I’ve been told that even though my skirts were technically acceptable, they
were still too short for me to wear, and once it was suggested that I should
follow a separate dress code...”
c) Sarcasm: The author uses sarcasm to show that showing
bare shoulders should no longer be an issue for dress codes.
" “Slutty
Wednesday”—a day in which students deliberately violated the code that bars
them, among other restrictions, from wearing anything that bares their
shoulders. (The horror!)"
d) Ethos (Ethics): The author uses a student's story about
how she was told by school faculty that she was wearing an inappropriate dress
to school to have the reader think about the morals of this particular faculty
member.
" Ventimiglia also recalled being stopped by a school
official who told her that her dress was too short that that she could “show
off her curves” when she wasn’t in school. “...the dress code was only
instituted for my protection, because there are a lot of bad men outside
school, and if I was raped nobody would be able to take that away from me.
Then, she said, ‘and you want a husband, don’t you?"
e) Imagry: The author uses an example from one of the students
stopped for violating the dress code to give the reader a mental picture of the
types of outfits that are "inappropriate".
4) At first the title of the article caught my attention. However, as I read through the article the author's use of language attracted me to choose this article. I agree with the fact that women should be able to wear what they choose (not based on a school dress code.) I also agree (based on events seen during my high school years) that female students are more likely to be stopped for a dress code violation.
1 comment:
i read this article too, i agree with that girls get stopped more for dress code but i think that rather than fight against females having a dresscode, they should take better measures to enforce it on males. workplaces have dress codes too and you won't see a woman walking around a office in a tiny mini skirt, it's just flat out unprofessional and inappropriate and it's the same way in schools, on the other side of that though you don't see men in offices or professional environments sagging their pants and such. there's just a time and a place for everything, highschoolers don't need to be wearing "night out" clothes to school- male or female.
Post a Comment