Friday, July 20, 2012

About That Fringe Discussion on Monogamy . . .

I mentioned the book Sex at Dawn, which is going to be important in the disciplines anthropology, sociology and psychology (and our class, apparently) if it isn't already. What's it about? "Since Darwin's day, we've been told that sexual monogamy comes naturally to our species. Mainstream science--as well as religious and cultural institutions--has maintained that men and women evolved in families in which a man's possessions and protection were exchanged for a woman's fertility and fidelity. But this narrative is collapsing. How can reality be reconciled with the accepted narrative? It can't be, according to renegade thinkers Christopher Ryan and Cacilda Jethá. While debunking almost everything we "know" about sex, they offer a bold alternative explanation in this provocative and brilliant book. Ryan and Jethá's central contention is that human beings evolved in egalitarian groups that shared food, child care, and, often, sexual partners. . . . he authors show how far from human nature monogamy really is."

2 comments:

Unknown said...

monogamy seems to be necessary as a tool for the continuance of a dominance hiearchy set into place by the culture, to perpetuate a consumer/currency based lifestyle.

Amy Bolaski said...

Rob,
This is an excellent observation. Really well put.
I think, too, though, that monogamy IS a useful tool/good arrangement/semi-stable environment in which to raise children. I think it's something a lot of people: believe/want to believe in, feel that they deserve, think is a moral imperative, and feel cannot coexist with love. Maybe it can't; I don't know. But I do think it perpetuates many things inherently negative (along with the things I mention above that are more positive) -- a lot of doubt, distrust, desperation sprung from the desire to "do the right thing" (usually for someone else rather than self). Anyway. Good response!