I was under the impression that if we included the preface in our portfolio we didn't need to post the blog, but I see so many blog 6 posts I figured I'd rather be safe than sorry. If nothing else, maybe someone will get some entertainment out of it.
Generally speaking, whenever I start a new
paper, first I have to stare blankly at the computer screen for at least 20
minutes, which is immediately followed by a good round of cursing and
complaining about how I dislike having to do whatever it is I was sitting down
to do. This bout of ranting sometimes
takes place in multitude of rooms as I pace around my apartment flailing
manically due to the fact that I’m actually frustrated that my past addictions
have made it difficult for me to concentrate and focus. I take a breath, I sit
back down, typing out the first thoughts on the subject to pop into my head,
whether they are complete thoughts or not.
Sometimes it’s just a word, sometimes it’s a phrase or song lyrics. Then I realize that I need some more coffee. I drink a pot of coffee every single
day. When I’m doing schoolwork I
sometimes drink twice that amount.
I
save the document and close the program.
After my initial thoughts are down, I don’t look at the actual paper
again for a day or so. During this time
I’m constantly brainstorming. It doesn’t
matter if I’m watching a movie, playing on Facebook, or surfing at Warm Waters,
I’m rolling the paper around in my skull.
I’ve always done things like this in a similar manor, when I was young,
I thought I was procrastinating, mainly because my folks and teachers growing
up told me that’s what it was. I didn’t
realize that I need to walk away and do other things sometimes as part of my
creative process. I do this with studio
art as well.
The chicken or the egg: The first two
papers in this class I knew the direction I wanted to take and the point I
wanted to make. The last one, the
opinion piece, wasn’t so easy. I started
with the text and general ideas about a wide topic. I couldn’t quite nail down where I was going
or what exactly I was trying to say. I got
that light bulb moment for my focal point by watching a zombie movie.
Having worked on-air as a radio
personality, I understand that I have a dry sense of humor most of the time and
it tends to get a tad snarky sometimes.
While in class Thursday work shopping the sanctity of marriage paper
(I’m still flabbergasted that he chose that topic), I had to watch my words
very carefully, while making sure my opinion was known. “Are you saying children are better off in an
orphanage than with gay adoptive parents?” and “Even though his paper indicates
that a single mother doesn’t have a chance at raising a child without a father,
he couldn’t have possibly meant to say such a thing, it just reads that
way.” (Those are paraphrased at best.) I don’t enjoy writing bland technical instructions
like I had to do when I was in the Corps; I enjoy throwing in my thoughts and
opinions. I dug throwing my musical
tastes into the opinion piece. I’ve
never quoted Black flag or the Beastie Boys for an essay before now, and it
made me smile to do so. I still need
work on comma placement and transitions, but I’m better off now than when I
started the class. Being present for
every workshop helped out, because it’s easier to see our own flaws in other
people before we can see them in ourselves.
2 comments:
manor = manner blah...
I suppose the chicken or the egg debate comes in mighty handy in a variety of rhetorical situations.
Steve: what would we have done without you this summer? I mean, I know we have the rest of the peanut gallery contingency, but I believe you're part of the head trifecta.
Love this: "Being present for every workshop helped out, because it’s easier to see our own flaws in other people before we can see them in ourselves." I think part of the issue is that we're simply too close to our own work, especially if we're trying to edit it quickly after drafting (give yourself a week away from the assignment and you'd be surprised just how much you'd spot, quickly, when you came back to it).
***You did a good job framing your rhetorical response to Addison's paper.
Post a Comment